Edited paragraph
Finance teams spend hours every close fixing duplicate rows, inconsistent date formats, and broken formulas. [Product name] cleans those errors automatically, so your team can start analysis with data it can trust. [NEED: one proof point, e.g. "Teams cut cleanup time from X hours to Y"]
Upload a spreadsheet and see it cleaned in [NEED: time]. [NEED: trial or offer, e.g. "Free for 14 days, no card required"]
Main changes
-
Opened with the reader's problem. The original opened with "innovative, cutting-edge platform." The edit opens with what finance teams deal with at close. This follows the "lead with the reader's problem" fix for weak openings.
-
Replaced vague words with the facts they stood for. "Innovative," "cutting-edge," "best-in-class AI," "seamlessly streamline," and "unlock the power of your data" don't say what the product does. The edit says it cleans spreadsheets and names the errors it fixes. The skill treats "streamline" and "seamless" as placeholders, and the original had both in one sentence.
-
Removed the contrast reveal. "It is not just a tool, it is a game-changer" is a stock "not X, it's Y" pattern. The edit states the benefit directly: your team starts analysis with data it can trust.
-
Cut stock phrases. "Whether you are a startup or an enterprise, we have got you covered" is filler, and it also contradicts the finance-team focus. The edit speaks to one audience.
-
Made the CTA concrete. "Get started today!" became a specific first step ("Upload a spreadsheet") with a place for a time-to-result and a risk reducer such as a trial or no-card line.
-
Added proof slots instead of inventing numbers. The original made big claims with no evidence. I marked
[NEED: ...]where a stat, customer result, or offer belongs, since I don't have those facts.
Please check
- The error examples (duplicates, date formats, broken formulas) are my assumptions about what a finance spreadsheet cleaner fixes. Swap in what your tool actually handles.
- Send me the product name, a real result, and the trial terms, and I'll finalize the copy.
Real run in an isolated folder with only this skill installed. Only the Skill and Read tools were enabled, so nothing was fetched from the web and no file was written. The example is fictional. The paragraph to edit is invented.
它做什么
审查你已有的文案，而不是从零开始写。它按固定顺序做七轮打磨：清晰度、语气与风格、“所以呢”（每个主张有没有体现利益）、“拿出证据”（主张背后的依据）、具体性、强化情感，以及零风险（异议处理与风险兜底）。另有可选的专家小组打分方法和评分标准、词语/句子/段落层面的快速检查、AI 腔检查、常见文案问题及修法（功能堆砌、官话套话、开头无力、CTA 被埋没、缺少证据、泛泛而谈），以及翻新过时内容的流程。参考文档涵盖通俗英语替换、检查清单和内容翻新。
工作方式
- 你贴上文案，并说明用途。
- 模型逐轮打磨，返回修改后的版本，并解释主要改动。
- 指出哪些主张需要真实的证据。
适合什么场景
润色落地页、邮件和博客文章，以及翻新旧内容。
低风险：纯指令文件，没有脚本，不联网、不写文件。它只编辑你给它的文字。改写可能改变主张的含义，请核对改后的文案里每一条主张、数字和保证是否仍然属实。Skill 要求拿出真实证据而不是编造。部分交叉引用指向本包不包含的姊妹 Skill。已用一段虚构文字试用过一次。