首頁 / Skills / 電商運營 / 售後與退貨處理 Returns and Refunds Playbook
電商運營

售後與退貨處理 Returns and Refunds Playbook

AIBarsMITSkill 語言: 英文
授權已核對不含腳本低風險
演示真實執行紀錄 · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 2026年10月
A customer wrote to my clothing store: "I ordered a jacket 12 days ago. The tracking says delivered 9 days ago but I never got it. This is the second time you have wasted my money, I want a full refund now or I'll dispute the payment with my bank." Our policy: returns within 30 days for unworn items, refunds to the original payment method, lost parcels are investigated with the carrier and refunded or reshipped. Order value 89.00. The customer has one earlier order that was delivered late. Please tell me how to handle it and draft a reply.
Skill: returns-refunds-playbook

Case decision

Classification: Not delivered (carrier shows delivered, customer says not received). It is not a return, so the 30-day unworn-item rule doesn't apply. Your lost-parcel policy does: investigate with the carrier, then refund or reshipped.

Facts so far

  • Order value is 89.00, ordered 12 days ago, marked delivered 9 days ago.
  • The customer has one earlier order that arrived late. That is the only prior issue on record.
  • The customer says this is the second time. The first case was a delay, not a loss, so it isn't the same problem. Don't argue the point in your reply, but don't agree with it either.
  • They threaten a bank dispute if they don't get a full refund immediately.

Unknown (check before replying)

  • The carrier's delivery details: scan time, GPS location, photo or signature, and whether it went to a pick-up point or safe place.
  • Whether the shipping address matches the customer's address exactly.
  • Whether the customer has contacted the carrier or checked with neighbors or household members.
  • Your carrier's deadline for filing a claim.
  • Stock of the jacket, if you reship.

Recommendation

  1. Reply today and open the carrier inquiry now. Don't make the customer wait on the carrier's result if you can resolve it yourself.
  2. Ask only for what you need: check neighbors, building reception or a pick-up point, and confirm the address.
  3. Give a firm timeline, for example a decision within 3 business days of their reply.
  4. If the parcel isn't found, offer them a choice of a full refund to the original payment method or a reshipment. The amount is small, and a refund is likely cheaper than a chargeback.
  5. The refund or reshipment decision is yours. Because the customer is already unhappy, I'd lean toward resolving it quickly, even before the carrier finishes, if the delivery proof is weak.
  6. Don't tell them to withdraw or not file a dispute. If they file one anyway, respond to it with the evidence your payment provider asks for: the order record, tracking and delivery proof, this message history and your policy.

Escalate to a human or adviser if: the delivery proof strongly shows it reached the right address, or the customer has repeated non-delivery claims. Check local consumer rules and your payment provider's dispute deadlines, since I can't confirm what applies in your country.

Reply draft

Subject: Your jacket order – we're sorting this out

Hi [Name],

I'm sorry your jacket hasn't reached you, and I understand why you're frustrated. I've looked at your order, and the tracking shows it as delivered on [date], so I've opened an investigation with [carrier] today.

To help us move quickly, could you please:

  1. Check with neighbors, anyone else at your address, or building reception, and look around for a safe place or pick-up point where it may have been left.
  2. Confirm that this is the right delivery address: [address, masked].

Please reply by [date]. If the jacket can't be found, I'll offer you the choice of a full refund of 89.00 to your original payment method or a replacement sent to you. I'll confirm the decision within [3] business days of hearing from you.

Thank you for your patience. We want to put this right.

Kind regards,
[Your name], [Store name]

If you've already decided to refund right away, replace the middle paragraph with: "I've started your full refund of 89.00 to your original payment method. It should reach you within [timeframe]." Only say this if you've approved it.

Internal actions

  • Open the carrier inquiry or claim and note the deadline. Save the tracking history and delivery proof.
  • Log the case with the reason code "marked delivered, not received."
  • Don't restock or write off anything until the outcome is known.
  • If you reship, flag the order for tracking with a signature or pick-up point, if possible.
  • Record who approved the remedy.
  • If a dispute is filed, collect evidence and answer within the provider's deadline.

Return analysis

One case isn't a pattern. But if "delivered, not received" or late delivery keeps appearing with the same carrier or region, consider changing the carrier, adding signature or photo confirmation on higher-value orders, or setting a more realistic delivery promise.

Real run in an isolated folder with only this skill installed. Only the Skill and Read tools were enabled, so no command was run and no file was written. The store and all numbers are invented and the model had no access to a real store. Nothing was sent to anyone: the reply is a draft for the store owner to review. Legal and payment-provider rules are listed as things to check, not stated.

它做什麼

為每個案件提供一套可重複的流程:先分類(改變心意、寄錯或損壞、品質問題、未收到、重複訂單、濫用),蒐集事實,套用店鋪實際的政策,決定處理方式,回覆,執行(面單、退款、庫存),並記錄原因代碼。它列出退貨政策應當涵蓋的內容,起草針對已核准退貨、損壞或寄錯、超出政策範圍的請求、「顯示已送達但沒收到」以及憤怒或公開留言的回覆,並說明如何用支付服務商要求的證據應對拒付。然後它依原因、商品、管道與供應商對退貨分組,找出原因與最先要做的幾項改進。

輸出

一份案件決定(含仍未知的資訊)、依要求語言寫的回覆草稿、內部操作事項與退貨分析。

適合什麼場景

回覆退款請求或拒付威脅、撰寫或檢視退貨政策,以及降低退貨率。

說明與風險

低風險:純指令檔,沒有腳本,不連網、不寫檔。它給出的是營運指引,不是法律意見:消費者在退貨、退款、保固與拒付方面的權利因國家與商品而異,平台與支付服務商的規則也會變,所以它只列出需要查核的事項,絕不斷言法律要求什麼。回覆只是供店主審閱後自行發送的草稿,不會自動發出。涉及安全、人身傷害、法律威脅、詐欺或大額的案件,它會升級給真人處理。AIBars 原創(MIT)。已用一個虛構的服飾店試用過一次。