Case decision
Classification: Not delivered (carrier shows delivered, customer says not received). It is not a return, so the 30-day unworn-item rule doesn't apply. Your lost-parcel policy does: investigate with the carrier, then refund or reshipped.
Facts so far
- Order value is 89.00, ordered 12 days ago, marked delivered 9 days ago.
- The customer has one earlier order that arrived late. That is the only prior issue on record.
- The customer says this is the second time. The first case was a delay, not a loss, so it isn't the same problem. Don't argue the point in your reply, but don't agree with it either.
- They threaten a bank dispute if they don't get a full refund immediately.
Unknown (check before replying)
- The carrier's delivery details: scan time, GPS location, photo or signature, and whether it went to a pick-up point or safe place.
- Whether the shipping address matches the customer's address exactly.
- Whether the customer has contacted the carrier or checked with neighbors or household members.
- Your carrier's deadline for filing a claim.
- Stock of the jacket, if you reship.
Recommendation
- Reply today and open the carrier inquiry now. Don't make the customer wait on the carrier's result if you can resolve it yourself.
- Ask only for what you need: check neighbors, building reception or a pick-up point, and confirm the address.
- Give a firm timeline, for example a decision within 3 business days of their reply.
- If the parcel isn't found, offer them a choice of a full refund to the original payment method or a reshipment. The amount is small, and a refund is likely cheaper than a chargeback.
- The refund or reshipment decision is yours. Because the customer is already unhappy, I'd lean toward resolving it quickly, even before the carrier finishes, if the delivery proof is weak.
- Don't tell them to withdraw or not file a dispute. If they file one anyway, respond to it with the evidence your payment provider asks for: the order record, tracking and delivery proof, this message history and your policy.
Escalate to a human or adviser if: the delivery proof strongly shows it reached the right address, or the customer has repeated non-delivery claims. Check local consumer rules and your payment provider's dispute deadlines, since I can't confirm what applies in your country.
Reply draft
Subject: Your jacket order – we're sorting this out
Hi [Name],
I'm sorry your jacket hasn't reached you, and I understand why you're frustrated. I've looked at your order, and the tracking shows it as delivered on [date], so I've opened an investigation with [carrier] today.
To help us move quickly, could you please:
- Check with neighbors, anyone else at your address, or building reception, and look around for a safe place or pick-up point where it may have been left.
- Confirm that this is the right delivery address: [address, masked].
Please reply by [date]. If the jacket can't be found, I'll offer you the choice of a full refund of 89.00 to your original payment method or a replacement sent to you. I'll confirm the decision within [3] business days of hearing from you.
Thank you for your patience. We want to put this right.
Kind regards,
[Your name], [Store name]
If you've already decided to refund right away, replace the middle paragraph with: "I've started your full refund of 89.00 to your original payment method. It should reach you within [timeframe]." Only say this if you've approved it.
Internal actions
- Open the carrier inquiry or claim and note the deadline. Save the tracking history and delivery proof.
- Log the case with the reason code "marked delivered, not received."
- Don't restock or write off anything until the outcome is known.
- If you reship, flag the order for tracking with a signature or pick-up point, if possible.
- Record who approved the remedy.
- If a dispute is filed, collect evidence and answer within the provider's deadline.
Return analysis
One case isn't a pattern. But if "delivered, not received" or late delivery keeps appearing with the same carrier or region, consider changing the carrier, adding signature or photo confirmation on higher-value orders, or setting a more realistic delivery promise.
Real run in an isolated folder with only this skill installed. Only the Skill and Read tools were enabled, so no command was run and no file was written. The store and all numbers are invented and the model had no access to a real store. Nothing was sent to anyone: the reply is a draft for the store owner to review. Legal and payment-provider rules are listed as things to check, not stated.
하는 일
사건마다 반복해서 쓸 수 있는 절차를 제공합니다. 분류(단순 변심, 오배송·파손, 불량, 미수령, 중복 주문, 악용), 사실 수집, 매장의 실제 정책 적용, 조치 결정, 답장, 실행(라벨, 환불, 재고), 사유 코드 기록입니다. 반품 정책이 담아야 할 내용을 나열하고, 승인된 반품, 파손·오배송, 정책 밖 요청, '배송 완료로 나오지만 받지 못함', 화가 났거나 공개된 메시지에 대한 답장을 작성하며, 결제 대행사가 요구하는 증빙으로 차지백에 대응하는 방법을 설명합니다. 이어서 반품을 사유, 상품, 채널, 공급업체별로 묶어 원인과 가장 먼저 할 개선을 찾습니다.
출력
아직 모르는 정보를 포함한 사건 판단, 요청한 언어의 답장 초안, 내부 조치 사항, 반품 분석.
이런 때 좋습니다
환불 요청이나 차지백 위협에 답할 때, 반품 정책을 쓰거나 검토할 때, 반품을 줄일 때.
낮은 위험:스크립트가 없는 지침 패키지로, 네트워크 접속이나 파일 쓰기가 없습니다. 운영 지침이며 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 반품, 환불, 보증, 차지백에 관한 소비자의 권리는 국가와 상품마다 다르고 플랫폼과 결제 대행사의 규정도 바뀌므로 확인할 사항만 나열하고 법이 무엇을 요구하는지는 단정하지 않습니다. 답장은 판매자가 검토한 뒤 직접 보내는 초안이며 자동으로 발송되지 않습니다. 안전, 부상, 법적 위협, 사기, 고액이 걸린 사건은 사람에게 에스컬레이션합니다. AIBars가 만든 오리지널(MIT). 가상의 의류 매장으로 한 번 시험 실행했습니다.