데모실행 기록 · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 2026년 10월

My image prompt keeps giving me messy, weird pictures. Here is the prompt: "beautiful stunning masterpiece 8k ultra detailed girl in a red dress standing in a forest at night, bright sunny day, holding a sword and a bouquet of flowers and a lantern, cyberpunk watercolor oil painting style, minimalist but very intricate, a sign that says 'WELCOME TO THE ENCHANTED WOODS', no bad hands" What I get: three different styles mixed, the girl has too many fingers, the sign text is gibberish, and it is never night and day at once. Please fix it. I'm not sure which tool I'm using.

Skill: image-prompt-debugging

Diagnosis

Problem	Evidence in your prompt	Confidence
Three mixed styles	"cyberpunk watercolor oil painting" names three media. The model blends them.	Likely
Never night and day at once	"at night" and "bright sunny day" contradict each other. The model picks one or averages them.	Likely
Messy and cluttered	"minimalist but very intricate" contradicts itself. Three held objects plus a sign plus a forest is a lot for one image.	Likely
Too many fingers	The girl holds a sword, a bouquet and a lantern, which needs several complex hand grips. Many generators handle hands badly.	Likely
Gibberish sign text	Many generators render long text unreliably, and a 5-word all-caps phrase is a hard case.	Likely
"no bad hands" does nothing	Many tools read "hands" as something to draw and ignore the "no". It can even draw more attention to hands.	Possible
Filler words add nothing	"beautiful stunning masterpiece 8k ultra detailed" is abstract and gives the model nothing to draw.	Possible

Minimal fix

Changes are in bold.

~~beautiful stunning masterpiece 8k ultra detailed~~ girl in a red dress standing in a forest at night, ~~bright sunny day,~~ holding a lantern only, ~~a sword and a bouquet of flowers and~~ watercolor painting style, ~~cyberpunk watercolor oil painting style, minimalist but very intricate,~~ a wooden sign reading "WELCOME" ~~that says 'WELCOME TO THE ENCHANTED WOODS', no bad hands~~

Clean rewrite

A girl in a red dress standing on a forest path at night, holding a glowing lantern in one hand, the other arm relaxed at her side. Full-body shot, centered, with tall dark trees behind her and a small wooden sign reading "WELCOME" to her left. Warm lantern light on her face and dress, deep blue moonlit shadows. Watercolor painting, soft washes, simple background.

If your tool has a negative prompt field, put this there: extra fingers, deformed hands, blurry text, mixed styles.

Variants to test

Night and day together. Keep the rest, but change the light to "dusk, last orange sunset glow on the horizon, deep blue sky above, lantern lit". Dusk is the closest a single image gets to night and day at once. Look for whether the light now looks coherent.
Keep the sword and flowers. Use "holding a lantern in her left hand, a sword sheathed at her belt", and drop the bouquet. Look for whether the hands stay correct when one hand is holding the lantern and the other is empty.

For a cyberpunk look, make that a separate test. Use "oil painting, neon pink and teal rim light" in place of watercolor. Don't combine it with the other styles.

Test plan

Change one thing at a time and generate 3–4 images per version with the same settings.
If hands are still wrong, crop or hide them: "hands behind her back", or a waist-up shot with the lantern at the edge of the frame.
For the sign, either shorten it to one word (as above) or leave it blank ("a blank wooden sign") and add the text in an image editor afterward. This is the most reliable method.

What I couldn't tell

Which tool you're using. This matters for several things:
- Midjourney and Stable Diffusion use negative prompts differently (--no and a negative field). Tools like DALL·E or ChatGPT image generation usually have no negative field, so describe what you want instead.
- Newer models handle text and hands much better than older ones, so your results may improve just by switching.
What your images look like. If you share one, I can tell you more precisely what went wrong.
Check your tool's docs for how it handles negative prompts, text rendering and aspect ratio. A tall ratio like 2:3 suits a full-body standing figure.

Real run in an isolated folder with only this skill installed. Only the Skill and Read tools were enabled, so no command was run and no file was written. The scenario is fictional. No image was generated: the model only wrote text prompts, so how well they work depends on the image tool you use. The model could not see any generated image, so its diagnosis is a set of hypotheses to test.

하는 일

디버거처럼 일합니다. 정확한 프롬프트, 사용 도구, 무엇이 어긋났는지를 모은 뒤 흔한 문제 표와 대조해 읽습니다(일부 무시, 밋밋한 결과, 어수선함, 섞인 스타일, 모순, 잘못된 구도, 평평한 빛, 색 번짐, 일그러진 손, 깨진 글자, 원치 않는 요소, 실행마다 다른 결과). 각 문제마다 프롬프트 안의 근거와 확신 정도를 밝히고, 바뀐 곳을 표시한 최소 수정, 깔끔한 재작성, 각각 한 가지만 시험하는 변형 두 개를 보여 줍니다.

함께 다루는 것

테스트 계획(변수 하나씩 바꾸기, 버전마다 여러 장 생성, 같은 설정에서 비교), 도구나 모델 자체의 한계일 때, 이미지나 도구의 동작을 볼 수 없어 판단하지 못한 부분.

이런 때 좋습니다

'안 먹히는' 프롬프트, 늘 세부 하나가 빠지는 이미지, 어떤 단어가 실제로 영향을 주는지 알고 싶을 때.

참고 및 위험

낮은 위험：스크립트가 없는 지침 패키지로, 네트워크 접속이나 파일 쓰기가 없습니다. 프롬프트와 결과에 대한 설명을 바탕으로 판단합니다. 이미지를 공유하지 않으면 볼 수 없고 도구가 단어에 가중치를 어떻게 주는지도 알 수 없으므로 모든 진단은 시험해 볼 가설입니다. 도구의 안전 필터나 약관 우회, 실존 인물을 속이려는 흉내, 실존 인물이나 미성년자가 나오는 성적인 내용 제작은 돕지 않습니다. 네거티브 프롬프트와 글자 렌더링 동작은 사용하는 도구의 문서에서 확인하세요. AIBars가 만든 오리지널(MIT). 가상의 엉망인 프롬프트로 한 번 시험 실행했으며 이미지는 생성하지 않았습니다.